Intel Core M 5Y70 Broadwell Tested, Benchmarked | Digital Trends
Product Reviews Phones TVs Laptops Cars Games Tablets Headphones Cameras Desktops Sound Bars Wireless Speakers & Docks Appliances Wearables More Reviews News Mobile Computing Home Theater Gaming Cars Photography DT Home Movies Music Wearables Cool Tech Sports More News Videos Features football games Deals Contests More Advertise About Us Contact Us Corrections Privacy Policy Terms of Use Jobs The Manual
Fighter milestone: F-22s and F-35s train together for the first time
At IFA 2014, Intel gave us the full skinny on its fifth-generation Broadwell-based Intel Core M CPUs. The chips would be thinner, and more energy-efficient than past CPUs, while also offering solid performance. They would pave the way for slimmer, lighter devices than anything we’ve ever seen before.
If our time with the Core M-powered Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro is any indication, that latter bit is true. But what about the energy football games efficiency and performance aspects? Does Core M measure up, or does it come up short?
The most efficient chips from about four years ago need 18.5 watts to operate. Similar chips from last year require 11.5 watts of power. Core M cuts that number football games down drastically, asking football games for a mere 4.5 watts of juice.
However, there’s more to Core M than increased efficiency, and (presumably) better battery life for whatever devices it’s in. Core M chips are also, as we mentioned, much smaller than their older siblings.
Also, because Core M sips on energy, it can operate while fan-less. This allows computer manufacturers football games to omit components from their systems that are associated with keeping internals cool, including fans, heat-sinks, and air vents. Sizing up our Core M chip
Keep in mind that Core M consists of a family of chips, not just one part. The one we got our hands on, the 5Y70, is the second most powerful Core M chip that Intel is launching as part of this wave of silicon. The Intel Core M 5Y70 is a dual-core chip clocked at 1.1GHz, with a Turbo Boost clock of 2.6GHz.
Not only is this the fastest Core M chip that’s out now, it’ll only be 100MHz slower than the highest-end Core M chip that Intel is launching this year. The next chip up on the totem pole is the 5Y71. That CPU runs at 1.2GHz, sports a Turbo Boost clock of 2.9GHz, and is also a dual-core chip. How we test
Moving on, we next tested football games the Core M 5Y70 CPU in the Yoga 3 Pro using 7-Zip. The Yoga 2 Pro scored 7,080, and the Dell XPS 13 is neck and neck with it at 7,079. The Yoga 3 Pro’s Core M CPU was far behind, however, with a grade of 5,347.
In Geekbench, the Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro earned a single-core football games score of 2,453, and a multi-core mark of 4,267. We didn’t use Geekbench when we reviewed football games the Yoga 2 Pro and Dell XPS 13, but we did use it with Lenovo’s Z40 notebook , which has the same Core i5-4200U processor that the 13 and the Yoga 2 Pro have. The Z40 earned a multi-core score of 4,628.
The Intel Core M 5Y70 is clearly not built for strenuous workloads. If you keep multi-tasking under control, though, it should at least make for a passable football games computing experience. Ultimately, this chip is best suited for tablets, and Chromebooks. Graphics performance
The Lenovo Yoga 2 Pro scored 3,889 in 3DMark Cloud Gate, and 579 in 3DMark Fire Strike. football games The Dell XPS 13 got 4,507 and 627 in the same tests, respectively. The Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro lags behind both significantly, with scores of 2,636 in Cloud Gate, and 376 in Fire Strike.
Though the Yoga 2 Pro and the Dell XPS 13 don’t conquer these tests, they’re in a different league. Both have well over 1,000 points on the Yoga 3 Pro in 3DMark Cloud Gate, and scores that are at least 200 points higher in Fire Strike.
Combine that with real-world performance, and you’ve got yourself a clear picture football games of what a graphics chip can do. We fired up League of Legends, a popular game that’s also the least demanding title we use to test GPUs.
Forget about enjoying it with the Core M, at least on the Yoga 3 Pro. With League of Legends running at the display’s native resolution of 3,200 x 1,800, the game ran between football games 18, and 8 frames per second. football games The game’s visual details were set to Medium.
In the Peacekeeper Web browsing benchmark test, the Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro lasted only three hours and 44 minutes on a single charge. That’s a notable improvement of 30 minutes over the Yoga 2 Pro’s time of three hours and 14 minutes. Both notebooks have 3,200 x 1,800 displays.
As with graphics capabilities, we want to see what Core M can provide in a 720p or 1080p system. In the Yoga 3 Pro, however, no amount of CPU-centric power efficiency can save Lenovo’s latest from a poor battery life score. Conclusion
Right now, PC sales are up . A big reason why is because a lot of folks are replacing old systems with new hardware. If you̵
Product Reviews Phones TVs Laptops Cars Games Tablets Headphones Cameras Desktops Sound Bars Wireless Speakers & Docks Appliances Wearables More Reviews News Mobile Computing Home Theater Gaming Cars Photography DT Home Movies Music Wearables Cool Tech Sports More News Videos Features football games Deals Contests More Advertise About Us Contact Us Corrections Privacy Policy Terms of Use Jobs The Manual
Fighter milestone: F-22s and F-35s train together for the first time
At IFA 2014, Intel gave us the full skinny on its fifth-generation Broadwell-based Intel Core M CPUs. The chips would be thinner, and more energy-efficient than past CPUs, while also offering solid performance. They would pave the way for slimmer, lighter devices than anything we’ve ever seen before.
If our time with the Core M-powered Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro is any indication, that latter bit is true. But what about the energy football games efficiency and performance aspects? Does Core M measure up, or does it come up short?
The most efficient chips from about four years ago need 18.5 watts to operate. Similar chips from last year require 11.5 watts of power. Core M cuts that number football games down drastically, asking football games for a mere 4.5 watts of juice.
However, there’s more to Core M than increased efficiency, and (presumably) better battery life for whatever devices it’s in. Core M chips are also, as we mentioned, much smaller than their older siblings.
Also, because Core M sips on energy, it can operate while fan-less. This allows computer manufacturers football games to omit components from their systems that are associated with keeping internals cool, including fans, heat-sinks, and air vents. Sizing up our Core M chip
Keep in mind that Core M consists of a family of chips, not just one part. The one we got our hands on, the 5Y70, is the second most powerful Core M chip that Intel is launching as part of this wave of silicon. The Intel Core M 5Y70 is a dual-core chip clocked at 1.1GHz, with a Turbo Boost clock of 2.6GHz.
Not only is this the fastest Core M chip that’s out now, it’ll only be 100MHz slower than the highest-end Core M chip that Intel is launching this year. The next chip up on the totem pole is the 5Y71. That CPU runs at 1.2GHz, sports a Turbo Boost clock of 2.9GHz, and is also a dual-core chip. How we test
Moving on, we next tested football games the Core M 5Y70 CPU in the Yoga 3 Pro using 7-Zip. The Yoga 2 Pro scored 7,080, and the Dell XPS 13 is neck and neck with it at 7,079. The Yoga 3 Pro’s Core M CPU was far behind, however, with a grade of 5,347.
In Geekbench, the Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro earned a single-core football games score of 2,453, and a multi-core mark of 4,267. We didn’t use Geekbench when we reviewed football games the Yoga 2 Pro and Dell XPS 13, but we did use it with Lenovo’s Z40 notebook , which has the same Core i5-4200U processor that the 13 and the Yoga 2 Pro have. The Z40 earned a multi-core score of 4,628.
The Intel Core M 5Y70 is clearly not built for strenuous workloads. If you keep multi-tasking under control, though, it should at least make for a passable football games computing experience. Ultimately, this chip is best suited for tablets, and Chromebooks. Graphics performance
The Lenovo Yoga 2 Pro scored 3,889 in 3DMark Cloud Gate, and 579 in 3DMark Fire Strike. football games The Dell XPS 13 got 4,507 and 627 in the same tests, respectively. The Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro lags behind both significantly, with scores of 2,636 in Cloud Gate, and 376 in Fire Strike.
Though the Yoga 2 Pro and the Dell XPS 13 don’t conquer these tests, they’re in a different league. Both have well over 1,000 points on the Yoga 3 Pro in 3DMark Cloud Gate, and scores that are at least 200 points higher in Fire Strike.
Combine that with real-world performance, and you’ve got yourself a clear picture football games of what a graphics chip can do. We fired up League of Legends, a popular game that’s also the least demanding title we use to test GPUs.
Forget about enjoying it with the Core M, at least on the Yoga 3 Pro. With League of Legends running at the display’s native resolution of 3,200 x 1,800, the game ran between football games 18, and 8 frames per second. football games The game’s visual details were set to Medium.
In the Peacekeeper Web browsing benchmark test, the Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro lasted only three hours and 44 minutes on a single charge. That’s a notable improvement of 30 minutes over the Yoga 2 Pro’s time of three hours and 14 minutes. Both notebooks have 3,200 x 1,800 displays.
As with graphics capabilities, we want to see what Core M can provide in a 720p or 1080p system. In the Yoga 3 Pro, however, no amount of CPU-centric power efficiency can save Lenovo’s latest from a poor battery life score. Conclusion
Right now, PC sales are up . A big reason why is because a lot of folks are replacing old systems with new hardware. If you̵
No comments:
Post a Comment